Tag Archives: social life

Liebowitz Error Means Purple Jesus May Be Resurrected

The saga continues. After a strange turn of events involving a screw-up by Prez Liebowitz and Shirley Collado, it looks like Purple Jesus may have a chance at continuing at the Mill.

Liebowitz sent an email to the Community Council on May 30th admitting he “never completed the process I have been committed to following” for deciding whether or not to approve the Community Council (CC)’s decision to let the Mill continue to be an exception to the Social House Pilot Program so it can continue throwing Purple Jesus parties. What did he miss? Consulting the CC, which has spent time working with the Mill and discussing the nuances of its exception to the Pilot Program and its impact on the community.

Back in April, we all thought it was safe after the Community Council nearly unanimously voted to continue allowing the Mill to be an exception for the pilot program. It seemed like Liebowitz’s approval would be a mere formality. But then he surprised everyone by sending the Community Council a letter saying he would not approve their decision. It was unprecedented for him to overturn such a strong CC recommendation without first consulting them. As you can see in his letter, he didn’t mince words: “After due consideration, I have decided not to accept the Community Council’s decision to formalize the exception for the Mill,” he wrote.

But in his latest email to the CC, he explained that he had Shirley Collado draft two letters concerning the Mill decision: one that accepted the CC’s recommendation and one that didn’t. He claims that because it was such a busy time of year and he just recently made his decision on Delta, he thought he was signing a letter about Delta, not the Mill.

So now he is taking back his final decision until he has a chance to talk to the Community Council about the issue, which will hopefully happen in the next few weeks.

He concluded his email by saying: “I apologize for my error.  I should underscore that I have not arrived at a decision, but that does not mean I will come out in agreement with the Council; I may, or I may not.  I need to have this conversation with the Council to better understand its position.   I missed that step in the process.”

Now there are a lot of question marks surrounding this (Update: President Liebowitz pretty much answered these questions in his comment below). like why it took so long for him to realize his mistake (over a week), what Dean Collado’s role in this was, how often he doesn’t look at things he signs, etc. While conspiracy theories may start to fly, the most important thing is Purple Jesus, with the backing of the Community Council, has a solid chance of making it out of this weird series of events alive.

We will keep you posted on any more news we hear about the state of Purple Jesus.

Liebowitz Ends Purple Jesus

On Tuesday, President Liebowitz surprised just about everyone by declining the Community Council’s strong recommendation to allow the Mill to continue to be an official exception to the social house pilot program, which bans hard alcohol. This means the Mill can no longer host Purple Jesus, one of the most popular and storied all-campus parties and the Mill’s longest (over twenty years) and most important tradition.

We all assumed Purple Jesus was safe after the Community Council voted 14 in favor, 2 opposed, 3 abstentions to let the Mill continue to be an exception to the pilot program and its hard alcohol ban. While many rumors surround the content of the Purple Jesus drink, P Safe monitors its preparation closely and it is diluted to 5.4% abv.–weaker than heavy beer. Furthermore, Purple Jesus events have had hardly any problems with citations or dorm damage.  But Liebowitz decided to decline the nearly unanimous recommendation anyways:

Screen shot 2013-05-23 at 4.01.28 PM

This will certainly not help with brewing student frustration over administrative micromanaging of the social scene. And with no Purple Jesus and no ADP, many predict Midd’s social scene will begin to move even more underground and off-campus, which will have repercussions of its own.

We will keep you updated with any more news we hear about Liebowitz’s decision.

middbeat minutes: Discussing the Future of Social Life at Midd

Students turn out to discuss the future of our social life

Students discuss the future of our social life

Middlebury’s social scene is still in the midst of an identity crisis. It largely began in the 90s when the College got rid of frats and sororities, which provided the foundation of Midd’s social life for, like, a hundred plus years. With the end of Greek life came a make over of the school’s identity from a typical white, privileged New England college (epitomized by fraternities and sororities) to a prestigious, diverse, global-minded, environmentally-conscientious, etc. institution, and brand really.

While most would probably agree this new identity has been a positive change overall, Midd still hasn’t figured out what it means for its social scene. This confusion has manifested itself in tensions over the role of alcohol consumption, social institutions like social houses and superblocks, strict Vermont State alcohol laws and the administration (old chapel, res life, pub safe, etc.) in defining our social scene. Student frustration over the administration micromanaging nightlife and shutting down social houses, a perceived lack of trust between students and pub safe, alcohol task forces, convocation speeches littered with warnings about knowing your limits have all emanated from this.

We also still have an alarming lack of student owned-space and student-created traditions (what gives, this school is over two hundred year old?!), which is partly the case, it could be argued, because we still haven’t filled the void of the greek system on campus and figured out what our new social scene/identity is exactly. But within this frustration, there also exists (we think) a kind of  excitement at the opportunity for students right now to organize and reclaim social events, traditions, and spaces that will define the next iteration of Midd’s social scene .

A lot of this frustration and excitement was present tonight among the dozens of students who showed up to Crossroads this evening for a discussion called “What is the future of social life at Middlebury?” led by Student Co-Chair of Community Council Barrett Smith ’13 and co-sponsored by Community Council, SGA and the Dean of the College Office.

Among the those present were movers and shakers from social houses, MCAB, SGA (including two presidential candidates) as well as a few administrators (I saw Katy Smith-Abbott, Doug Adams and Shirley Collado). The discussion was directed around the following questions: Should hard alcohol be banned on campus? What is the future of social houses? How will this affect campus social life? Should the Atwater Suites be regularly patrolled by Public Safety? Should more parties be registered and what would promote that?

middbeat kept some unofficial minutes from the group discussion. Here are some of the themes that emerged:
THE KEG:

Many argued the merits of the keg as a great way to provide regulated alcohol to lots of people and create community at the same time.  Many wished it was easier for groups to acquire kegs and keep them for longer. Currently, kegs are confiscated after four hours encouraging people to empty its contents quicker to get their money’s worth, and or just to buy thirty racks instead, which promote faster, more exclusive drinking. Continue reading

Giving “Bro” Culture A Voice Of Its Own

Screen Shot 2013-04-01 at 9.24.54 PM

Lately, writing-inclined Midd folk have gotten their hands dirty in what I’d coin “Middlebury bro-ology,” or, the study of “bros” at Midd. Recent dabbles in Midd bro-ology include Nathan Weil’s ’15 Middlebury Campus op-ed defending the white-privileged-male-econ major against the feminist “condescension” found in Sam Kaufman’s ’12.5‘s Campus article, and Cody Gohl ’13′s MiddBlog analysis of “bro” culture. Last month’s ADP disbandment further ignited tensions among “bro-ologists,” as many deemed Delta house “home of the bros.” For the purposes of this article, a Middlebury “bro” is defined as a white, male athlete, though Cody’s post associates “bros” with traits such as ”racial/social/economic elitism, misogyny, affiliations with sports teams, heavy drinking, dorm damage, homophobia, close-mindedness.”

I think most of us agree with Cody that “bro-hate is stupid and unproductive.” That being said, stereotypes like “bro,” “hipster”, “nerd” etc. are deeply engrained in our vernacular, despite often being incorrect, offensive, and vehicles for social segregation. Influences like the hit 2010 “Midd Kid” music video prime our acceptance of such social stereotypes even before arriving on campus, though this video offended targeted groups including “lax bros” as described here.

But amid all the discussion of “bros” in campus media, the voices of those labeled as “bros” have been left out. Social psychology explains that no matter how many reliable peers tell us the dude decked out in croakied Ray Bans and Vineyard Vines should not be defined by elitism, over-aggression, and intolerance, stereotype reversal depends on “bros” themselves providing counter-examples.

In this spirit, sixteen white, male, athletes were asked by email for personal reflections upon various “bro” stereotypes (racial/social/economic elitism, misogyny, affiliations with sports teams, heavy drinking, dorm damage, homophobia, close-mindedness). Here’s what they had to say (bold was put in by the post author):

Nick Spencer ’15, White, Soccer/Track, Psychology:
“Yes, there are kids on campus labeled as “bros” who can be slightly malicious, aggressive, ignorantly rude, and whatever other stereotypes the word ‘bro’ has taken on. The word bro is not the problem, though. I refer to many of my friends as “bros and do so in a way that perpetuates the trust and reliance I hold in them… That said, let me clarify that I do not condone any inappropriate behavior… We all need to take a step back and remember how important it is to respect the place and people around us.

Arguing about this topic only spreads negative feelings around campus, and helps fragment the already split social scene… In reality, all these categories (bro’s, hipsters, nerds, etc.) hold a rigidity that belittles everyone and deprives people of their human complexity… We all make mistakes, we all have the potential to be better, it is very possible to make this school a more fun place for everyone. We already suffer enough from the Grill not being open after 2 and the lack of juice at lunch. We don’t have to suffer because of each other.”

Travis Fishstein ’15, White, Baseball, Biochemistry:
“I do not consider myself a “bro.” A traditional interpretation of the word ‘bro’ means literally, one’s brother.  Thus, a bro is anyone (usually male) that one (again, male) sees and feels towards as being of the same level of emotional and cultural meaning as a true, genetic brother.  Now, this term can either be invoked in a serious manner (picture a middle aged guy saying “I love you, bro” to a lifelong best friend) or in a very nonchalant manner (“what’s up, bro”). When we get into trouble, then, is when the word degrades to the point where a ‘bro’ becomes so meaningless that it can be used in phrases like “come at me, bro”… A man you are about to fight is a NOT a bro.

However, just because you are a baseball player does not make you a bro, though it provides a foundation for a “bro-lationship.”  This is no different to the foundation a roommate or a family friend has. What makes the term bro so appealing is the traditional meaning it invokes.  However, this word has degraded. [Consequentially] I am stigmatized by a small group of young men who are largely physically, economically and socially similar to me, yet are not representative of what a bro is, or of the majority of ‘bro’s’ on campus. We are young men with ambition, pursuits and noble ideas, but sadly some of the more vocal members of this sub-set of students on campus cast a bad light.”

Click after the jump for more responses.
Continue reading